Timeline for Non-absolute convergence of series with asymtotically equal coefficients
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 15, 2010 at 2:35 | vote | accept | wood | ||
May 14, 2010 at 7:57 | answer | added | Emerton | timeline score: 2 | |
May 13, 2010 at 22:42 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 8 characters in body
|
May 13, 2010 at 19:28 | answer | added | Julián Aguirre | timeline score: 2 | |
May 13, 2010 at 17:52 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd |
Emerton's comment basically does it, I think --- you need to be able to control either the signs of the $\delta_n$ s or their sizes --- if $\sum \delta_n$ converges absolutely, for example, then you're golden, and this requires only that the approximation $f(n) \approx g(n)$ gets sufficiently better as $n\to \infty$. Emerton: you should leave your comment as an answer.
|
|
May 13, 2010 at 14:15 | comment | added | Emerton | Just subtracting one series from the other, it seems that you need $\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (f(n)-g(n))$ to converge. (This is what fails in Xandi Tuni's example.) Writing $f(n)/g(n) = 1 + \delta_n,$ so that $\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (f(n) - g(n)) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \delta_n g(n),$ you see need control over the signs of the $\delta_n$. E.g. if they are all of the same sign, you are okay, while if the sign of $\delta_n$ is always the same as, or always opposite to, that of $\delta_n, then you are in bad shape. (This is what goes wrong in Xandi Tuni's example.) | |
May 13, 2010 at 13:10 | answer | added | Xandi Tuni | timeline score: 12 | |
May 13, 2010 at 12:47 | history | edited | wood |
edited tags
|
|
May 13, 2010 at 12:41 | history | asked | wood | CC BY-SA 2.5 |