Timeline for Intuition behind the definition of the Siegel-Eichler transformation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 1:59 | vote | accept | Shinichiro Nakamura | ||
| Aug 1, 2016 at 3:43 | history | bounty ended | Shinichiro Nakamura | ||
| Jul 23, 2016 at 4:32 | comment | added | Shinichiro Nakamura | @Ruberman You are right. I have edited the question to make it clear. I apologize any confusion because of my bad English language. | |
| Jul 22, 2016 at 13:36 | comment | added | Danny Ruberman | Maybe you want to revise your question to ask for the algebraic intuition behind Siegel's definition. | |
| Jul 22, 2016 at 5:57 | comment | added | Shinichiro Nakamura | @Ruberman Thank you for your answer. Yes, I have already known geometric intuition (via Kirby calculus) of the map $E^1_\omega$. But I know next to nothing about algebraic point of view, too. | |
| Jul 22, 2016 at 5:41 | history | answered | Danny Ruberman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |