Timeline for Where to submit this work with several unusual features?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2017 at 10:17 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | probably one can publish it as a book with a software component (Springer used to do such things). Presumably Maple might help here---for all other purposes Maple is a hassle, as it severely limits the number of people who would use the code you wrote. There are so many ways to achieve the same with something free and open-source (I know what happened with my Maple V code I wrote in my previous life - it just stopped working after some newer version of Maple, and I dumped it)... | |
| Dec 9, 2017 at 0:28 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 9, 2017 at 10:23 | |||||
| Jul 25, 2016 at 8:28 | history | edited | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added arxiv link
|
| Jul 22, 2016 at 1:24 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | One possibility is to publish the paper any conventional journal that accepts long papers (e.g., the Memoirs of the AMS) and then to make the code available separately. This may seem unsatisfactory because the code is not permanently archived, but permanent archival for a closed-source commercial software package like Maple is problematic anyway. As for colo[u]r, in my experience, most journals can accommodate it, though they may charge for it. | |
| Jul 21, 2016 at 22:04 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Hi Neil. What's so sad is that you have to ask the question at all. Presumably you have created what you have created in order to benefit the mathematical community in some way, and the fact that you have created it already means the community can benefit. And now to placate your boss you need to get this "published" stamp of approval because of REF (UK government's way of ordering universities by publication quality, where publication is carefully defined). Sounds to me like it should be some sort of web resource, but the rules for REF won't allow for that! | |
| Jul 21, 2016 at 21:57 | comment | added | Neil Strickland | @CarloBeenakker an arXiv overlay is certainly a possibility. This work seems out of scope for SIGMA, but not by a million miles. | |
| Jul 21, 2016 at 21:02 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | since your work will anyway appear on arXiv, why not use an arXiv overlay journal, such as SIGMA for "formal publication" ? | |
| Jul 21, 2016 at 20:52 | history | asked | Neil Strickland | CC BY-SA 3.0 |