Timeline for Find the best constant to this bounded inequality
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 25, 2016 at 15:47 | vote | accept | math110 | ||
S Jul 20, 2016 at 4:40 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jul 20, 2016 at 4:40 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Jul 17, 2016 at 4:54 | answer | added | Robert Z | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 16, 2016 at 16:54 | answer | added | Robert Z | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 15, 2016 at 11:28 | vote | accept | math110 | ||
Jul 15, 2016 at 11:28 | |||||
Jul 14, 2016 at 6:23 | answer | added | Sergei | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 13, 2016 at 12:55 | comment | added | Sergei | May be start with simple $(\sum x_k)^2=\sum x_k x_m$ -? | |
S Jul 12, 2016 at 3:26 | history | bounty started | math110 | ||
S Jul 12, 2016 at 3:26 | history | notice added | math110 | Authoritative reference needed | |
Jul 10, 2016 at 14:54 | history | edited | math110 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 767 characters in body
|
Jul 10, 2016 at 1:32 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | If $i=j$ is allowed on the constraints, then it would rule out my suggested example. Although the phrasing is explicit, I would add your implication as a consequence to the conditions to make the problem robust against mistakes like mine. Gerhard "Back For A Third Reading" Paseman, 2016.07.09. | |
Jul 10, 2016 at 1:26 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | @GerhardPaseman Don't the conditions imply $x_1^2 \leq 1$? | |
Jul 10, 2016 at 1:07 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | What rules out the case of $x_1=2$ (or $C+1$) and the others set to zero or something really small and positive? Gerhard "Not Sure It's Been Proven" Paseman, 2016.07.09. | |
Jul 9, 2016 at 18:49 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 10, 2016 at 17:25 | |||||
Jul 9, 2016 at 15:21 | history | asked | math110 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |