Timeline for Is there an integral simple fusion ring of multiplicity one and Frobenius type? (obvious excepted)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2017 at 18:11 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor edit: replacement of the broken link
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jul 10, 2016 at 16:16 | comment | added | Dave Penneys | Yeah, somehow I missed both the words "integral" and "simple" and was merely thinking about multiplicity one... Sorry about that. | |
| Jul 10, 2016 at 15:59 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Everything was assumed of Frobenius type. So we have to mention it.
|
| Jul 9, 2016 at 16:44 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
title edit
|
| Jul 9, 2016 at 16:39 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
title edit
|
| Jul 9, 2016 at 16:07 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I've written again the definition of the basic notion, to avoid any confusion.
|
| Jul 9, 2016 at 15:59 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I've written again the definition of the basic notion, to avoid any confusion.
|
| Jul 8, 2016 at 14:55 | comment | added | Matthew Titsworth | Specifically, Tambara-Yamagami are $\mathbb Z_2$ graded. A simple fusion ring would have to be trivially graded. | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 12:12 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Jul 8, 2016 at 11:12 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I've improved the proof of the proposition (and recall it Lemma) and added a digression for multiplicity m.
|
| Jul 8, 2016 at 9:44 | comment | added | Sebastien Palcoux | @DavePenneys: Fibonacci is not integral and Tambara-Yamagami is not simple. | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 6:27 | comment | added | Dave Penneys | What about Fibonacci or Tambara-Yamagami? | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 2:00 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
title edit
|
| Jul 8, 2016 at 1:35 | history | edited | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos
|
| Jul 7, 2016 at 22:56 | history | asked | Sebastien Palcoux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |