Timeline for Spreading sets - especially without choice
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2016 at 22:06 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | Note: a previous version of this question had the main question garbled to the point of meaninglessness, although I think what I was trying to ask was clear from context. I've fixed that now. | |
| Jul 10, 2016 at 22:05 | vote | accept | Noah Schweber | ||
| Jul 10, 2016 at 22:04 | history | edited | Noah Schweber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 206 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2016 at 22:03 | answer | added | Noah Schweber | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 21:06 | comment | added | Asaf Karagila♦ | Noah, agree to disagree on that comment. | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 21:02 | history | edited | Noah Schweber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 21:01 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | @Goldstern Derp. This is why post-beer math is a bad idea. Fixed! | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 20:46 | comment | added | Goldstern | In the presence of choice, $\Theta(X)$ is the successor of the cardinality of $X$. If $X$ is countable, then in ZF we have $\Theta(X)=\omega_1$. | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 20:28 | history | asked | Noah Schweber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |