Timeline for A question about how much set theory can be developed based on the "subset" relation rather than the "elementhood" relation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 21:34 | comment | added | Thomas Benjamin | @GarabedGulbenkian: I'm glad the answer helped. | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 20:31 | comment | added | Garabed Gulbenkian | Many thanks for clearing up this question for me once and for all. | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 20:23 | vote | accept | Garabed Gulbenkian | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 13:45 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | I think the portion of this answer beginning "given the above" should really be a separate question - I don't think it has direct bearing on this question. (Also, I think it will take some work to make your final question precise - as it stands, it's very unclear to me exactly what it means.) | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 13:37 | history | edited | Thomas Benjamin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added words for further clarification
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 13:30 | history | edited | Thomas Benjamin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected spelling
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 13:22 | history | answered | Thomas Benjamin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |