Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 5, 2016 at 12:21 answer added Danny Ruberman timeline score: 7
Jul 5, 2016 at 11:09 comment added user83633 Maybe the following paper is interesting to you: Schmitt, Alexander, On the classification of certain piecewise linear and differentiable manifolds in dimension eight and automorphisms of connected sums of (S2×S5). Enseign. Math. (2) 48 (2002), no. 3-4, 263–289.
Jul 5, 2016 at 4:30 comment added mme You don't need to demand that things be so highly connected to have classification theorems; there is a (very difficult) classification theorem for simply connected 6-manifolds; see the manifold atlas. But this is already quite complicated, and if one for simply connected 8-manifolds is possible, it would be really very complicated indeed. Perhaps with some bravery one might dare to have a classification of 2-connected 8-manifolds.
Jul 5, 2016 at 3:32 comment added Qiaochu Yuan I think you get an analogous result if you ask for it to be 3-connected. math.stanford.edu/~ksiegel/N-1Connected2NManifolds.pdf discusses a result of this form.
Jul 5, 2016 at 2:58 comment added David Roberts I think that a 4-manifold being simply connected, and the results that flow from that, could really a manifestation of the fact it is 4-3=1-connected. Hence for an 8-manifold you might find a nice result for 5-connected examples...
Jul 5, 2016 at 0:17 history asked Bilateral CC BY-SA 3.0