Timeline for Statements going against the grain of Riemann Hypothesis (R.H.)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I think Newton used it long before Einstein. | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 12:50 | comment | added | Jérôme JEAN-CHARLES | @GerryMyerson I agree, yet in number theory and combinatorics summation is more common that derivative. You are right that in fact Einstein was a user of the point as a derivative as it kept some heavy torsor calculation much lighter. More over the proper usage is $\dot \mu ([1,N]) $ or $\dot \mu ([N]) $ as $M(N)$ . | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 2:57 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | One problem with a dot is that in some contexts it stands for derivative, but you want to use it for a summation, which is pretty nearly the opposite concept. | |
| Jun 29, 2016 at 20:46 | comment | added | Jérôme JEAN-CHARLES | @aosjckajsd You must have a problem with your browser : I have the point on my screen. As I said the point should be must bigger, I still think this is nice and not ambiguous but habits die hard...Now a dot is mot discrete and as generic as capitalizing a letter but save the M ... | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 23:48 | comment | added | Suvrit | which shows that the idea of having a dot did not quite make things clearer :-) | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 23:02 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I think you missed the dot over the mu in the suggested notation for the summatory function. | |
| Jun 28, 2016 at 19:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 28, 2016 at 19:51 | |||||
| Jun 28, 2016 at 19:50 | history | answered | aosjckajsd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |