Timeline for Combinatorial splitting in number rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 23, 2016 at 23:12 | history | edited | user94040 |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 23, 2016 at 22:38 | history | edited | user94040 |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 24, 2016 at 7:50 | history | edited | user94040 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
Jun 24, 2016 at 0:13 | history | edited | Myshkin |
+ top level tag (nt.)
|
|
Jun 23, 2016 at 21:39 | history | edited | user94040 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 171 characters in body
|
Jun 23, 2016 at 7:21 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 23, 2016 at 16:31 | |||||
Jun 23, 2016 at 7:13 | history | edited | user94040 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
Jun 23, 2016 at 7:12 | comment | added | user94040 | So you claim $t=2^n$ is the least $t$ we can have? | |
Jun 23, 2016 at 7:00 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | Can't you just take $t = 2^n$ (corresponding to $\mathcal P(\{1,\ldots,n\})$) and have each $a_j$ be equal to a $P_I$ (i.e. $J$ is always a singleton)? | |
Jun 23, 2016 at 6:27 | comment | added | user94040 | @KConrad I just want to know if there is an way to split combinatorially structured set of products in a number ring so that the resulting product has a nice structure. | |
Jun 23, 2016 at 5:19 | comment | added | KConrad | Could you write your question in plain English instead of using three nested quantifiers? That is, could you write the question in a manner that conveys how you really came across it? | |
Jun 23, 2016 at 4:55 | history | edited | user94040 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
Jun 23, 2016 at 3:42 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 23, 2016 at 4:55 | |||||
Jun 23, 2016 at 3:37 | history | asked | user94040 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |