Skip to main content
http --> https
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

deleted 72 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting,2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$,. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$, I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...).

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png

The requested generalization of Jacobi's two-square theorem is a remarkably recent result: N. Bagis and M.L Glasser, On the Number of Representations of Integers by various Quadratic and Higher Forms (2015):

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/sumofsquares_2.png

where $r(n)$ is Jacobi's formula for the number of representations of $n=x^2+y^2$.


I understand from the comments that this (general but complicated) formula is not what the OP was looking for. Berkovich and Yesilyurt in Ramanujan's Identities and Representation of Integers by Certain Binary and Quaternary Quadratic Forms (2006) give rather simple expressions for specific cases of $n=x^2+ay^2$. I reproduce below the result for $a=5$, and there are others (6,15,27,...). As explained in this 2012 MO posting, there is no simple Jacobi-type formula that will apply to any $a$.

http://ilorentz.org/beenakker/MO/arXiv_0611300.png
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 516 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 154 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 129 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
added 7 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651
Loading