Timeline for Geometry of numbers argument: counting integers with some linear condition
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 22:05 | comment | added | Johnny T. | Could you possible explain the part when you wrote: "Verify that there are at least $\lambda X/2$" by any chance? Thanks! | |
| Dec 30, 2016 at 21:52 | vote | accept | Johnny T. | ||
| Dec 31, 2016 at 22:26 | |||||
| Jun 22, 2016 at 17:48 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 36 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 16:55 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 107 characters in body; deleted 9 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 16:39 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1165 characters in body; added 22 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 16:29 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body; deleted 43 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 15:56 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body; added 17 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 14:32 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 941 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 14:25 | history | edited | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 941 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2016 at 8:35 | comment | added | js21 | I don't understand your conclusion. The factor $- 2 \lambda X$ in your final estimate is usually larger than the main term. | |
| Jun 22, 2016 at 5:30 | history | answered | Anton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |