Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15, 2010 at 16:54 vote accept Akela
May 11, 2010 at 20:29 comment added Charles Staats See also <a href="mathoverflow.net/questions/21717/… answer</a>, and Ravi Vakhil's comment.
May 11, 2010 at 18:59 answer added Xandi Tuni timeline score: 4
May 11, 2010 at 18:54 history edited Akela CC BY-SA 2.5
edited body
May 11, 2010 at 18:52 comment added BCnrd An instructive example beyond the "limit of finite etale" case: let $X$ be the nodal plane cubic. The infinite tree $X'$ of projective lines is etale over $X$ with covering group $\mathbf{Z}$, and for each $n \ge 1$ there's a unique $n$-gon intermediate cover $X_n$. This $X'$ is not "ind-finite-etale" over $X$, and is the analytification of the topological universal cover. So one has the "surprise" result that ${\rm{H}}^1(X,\mathbf{Z}) \ne 0$ (etale cohomology) whereas $\pi_1(X)$ has no nonzero cont. homs to $\mathbf{Z}$. Upshot: for non-normal $X$ some funny things happen.
May 11, 2010 at 18:47 comment added BCnrd In para. 3 you meant "algebraic geometry"? Deep result of Grauert/Remmert: if $X$ is loc. f.type over $\mathbf{C}$ (no smoothness, no properness), analytification is equivalence from category of finite etale covers of $X$ to finite covering spaces of $X(\mathbf{C})$. Best analogue of universal cover: invlim $X'$ of pointed conn'd finite etale covers (for $X$ conn'd of f.type, say). This gigantic scheme is conn'd, no nontrivial conn'd finite etale covers, ${\rm{Aut}}(X'/X)$ is "opposite" to $\pi_1(X,x)$, & conj. classes of closed subgps correspond to conn'd "ind-finite-etale" covers of $X$.
May 11, 2010 at 18:31 history asked Akela CC BY-SA 2.5