Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

+latex
Source Link
Myshkin
Myshkin
  • 17.6k
  • 5
  • 71
  • 137

This is not an answer but a followup question. In the p-adic case, is there any hope for a a set of conditions on the local Langlands correspondence which would make it unique? In the case of GL(n)$GL(n)$ this is provided by L and epsilon factors. For classical groups, can one make a precise statement (even conjecturally) for classical groups, using lifting to GL(n)$GL(n)$?

This is not an answer but a followup question. In the p-adic case, is there any hope for a set of conditions on the local Langlands correspondence which would make it unique? In the case of GL(n) this is provided by L and epsilon factors. For classical groups, can one make a precise statement (even conjecturally) for classical groups, using lifting to GL(n)?

This is not an answer but a followup question. In the p-adic case, is there any hope for a set of conditions on the local Langlands correspondence which would make it unique? In the case of $GL(n)$ this is provided by L and epsilon factors. For classical groups, can one make a precise statement (even conjecturally) for classical groups, using lifting to $GL(n)$?

Source Link
Jeffrey Adams
Jeffrey Adams
  • 2.4k
  • 20
  • 21

This is not an answer but a followup question. In the p-adic case, is there any hope for a set of conditions on the local Langlands correspondence which would make it unique? In the case of GL(n) this is provided by L and epsilon factors. For classical groups, can one make a precise statement (even conjecturally) for classical groups, using lifting to GL(n)?