Timeline for Smallest solution to $x^2 \equiv x\pmod{n}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:18 | vote | accept | Xiaosheng Mu | ||
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:18 | vote | accept | Xiaosheng Mu | ||
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:18 | |||||
Jun 21, 2016 at 15:14 | vote | accept | Xiaosheng Mu | ||
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:18 | |||||
Jun 20, 2016 at 19:46 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 18:47 | answer | added | Fedor Petrov | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 18:11 | history | edited | Mikhail Katz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jun 20, 2016 at 17:19 | history | edited | Arturo Magidin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix mod latex
|
Jun 20, 2016 at 17:03 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | There is a nontrivial solution by the Chinese Remainder Theorem. Moreover, each solution $x$ is paired with another solution $1-x$, that is, $n+1-x$, so one of those satisfies $1<x<n+1-x$, i.e., $x\le n/2$. | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 16:55 | comment | added | Kimball | Based on a small amount of numerical calculations, this may indeed be possible. What is your argument to get $x \le \frac n2$ when $n$ has at least 2 prime factors? | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 15:59 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 14:22 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | On the other hand, for arbitrary $n$ we have the lower bound $x\ge1/2+\sqrt{n+1/4}$. | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 14:06 | comment | added | Karl Fabian | For $n=k(k+1)$ one evidently has $x\leq 1/2+\sqrt{n+1/4}$ for $x=k+1$. | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 12:31 | answer | added | Mikhail Katz | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 20, 2016 at 2:24 | history | asked | Xiaosheng Mu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |