Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

I read that one of the current challenging problems in mathematics is constructing a minimal graph with a specified number of spanning treesconstructing a minimal graph with a specified number of spanning trees (say, $k$).

  • However, is there a quick way to create some graph $G$ (not necessarily minimal) that has $k$ spanning trees ?

We can compute the number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ using the pseudo-determinant of the Laplacian matrix of $G$ and the number of labelled vertices (Kirchoff's theorem).

Perhaps answering the following question helps in answering the original question:

  • is there a way to generate a Laplacian matrix given its pseudo-determinant value?

Thanks in advance!

I read that one of the current challenging problems in mathematics is constructing a minimal graph with a specified number of spanning trees (say, $k$).

  • However, is there a quick way to create some graph $G$ (not necessarily minimal) that has $k$ spanning trees ?

We can compute the number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ using the pseudo-determinant of the Laplacian matrix of $G$ and the number of labelled vertices (Kirchoff's theorem).

Perhaps answering the following question helps in answering the original question:

  • is there a way to generate a Laplacian matrix given its pseudo-determinant value?

Thanks in advance!

I read that one of the current challenging problems in mathematics is constructing a minimal graph with a specified number of spanning trees (say, $k$).

  • However, is there a quick way to create some graph $G$ (not necessarily minimal) that has $k$ spanning trees ?

We can compute the number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ using the pseudo-determinant of the Laplacian matrix of $G$ and the number of labelled vertices (Kirchoff's theorem).

Perhaps answering the following question helps in answering the original question:

  • is there a way to generate a Laplacian matrix given its pseudo-determinant value?

Thanks in advance!

Links repositioned, small aesthetic improvements
Source Link

I read that one of the current challenging problems in mathematics is constructing a minimal graph with a specified number constructing a minimal graph with a specified number of spanning trees (say, $k$) of spanning trees [1].

  • However, is there a quick way to create some graph $G$ (need not benot necessarily minimal) that has $k$ spanning trees ?

We can compute the number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ using the pseudo-determinant of the Laplacian matrix of $G$ and the number of labelled vertices [2](Kirchoff's theorem).

Perhaps answering the following question helps in answering the original question:

  • is there a way to generate a Laplacian matrix given its pseudo-determinant value?

Thanks in advance!

[1] Minimal graphs with a prescribed number of spanning trees

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff%27s_theorem

I read that one of the current challenging problems in mathematics is constructing a minimal graph with a specified number (say $k$) of spanning trees [1].

  • However, is there a quick way to create some graph $G$ (need not be minimal) that has $k$ spanning trees ?

We can compute the number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ using the pseudo-determinant of the Laplacian matrix of $G$ and the number of labelled vertices [2].

Perhaps answering the following question helps in answering the original question:

  • is there a way to generate a Laplacian matrix given its pseudo-determinant value?

Thanks in advance!

[1] Minimal graphs with a prescribed number of spanning trees

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff%27s_theorem

I read that one of the current challenging problems in mathematics is constructing a minimal graph with a specified number of spanning trees (say, $k$).

  • However, is there a quick way to create some graph $G$ (not necessarily minimal) that has $k$ spanning trees ?

We can compute the number of spanning trees of a graph $G$ using the pseudo-determinant of the Laplacian matrix of $G$ and the number of labelled vertices (Kirchoff's theorem).

Perhaps answering the following question helps in answering the original question:

  • is there a way to generate a Laplacian matrix given its pseudo-determinant value?

Thanks in advance!

added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading