Timeline for Representations of Pin vs. Representations of Clifford
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2010 at 17:11 | comment | added | darij grinberg | You are right: Reading my first post again, I don't see an indication that I disbelieved the assertion. I didn't expect I could ever fail to be negative enough... | |
| May 11, 2010 at 16:27 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | It would have been nice if you had included some indication to that effect in the statement of the question. It looks like many people were thrown off by the expectation that the statement was true. | |
| May 11, 2010 at 15:43 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Your reason 1 was exactly the reason why I had doubts about the statement. Otherwise I would have accepted Roe's "The proof is obvious"... | |
| May 11, 2010 at 15:22 | history | answered | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |