Timeline for When do non-exact functors induce morphisms on $K$-theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2021 at 11:15 | vote | accept | Akhil Mathew | ||
| Jun 20, 2021 at 11:12 | vote | accept | Akhil Mathew | ||
| Jun 20, 2021 at 11:15 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2021 at 18:22 | answer | added | Peter Scholze | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 26, 2016 at 0:59 | comment | added | Akhil Mathew | @FernandoMuro: I think that's exactly the problem. The non-exact functors I have in mind need not preserve homotopy pushouts. | |
| Jun 23, 2016 at 19:21 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Sorry, the functor should also preserve homotopy push-out squares and the zero object (up to homotopy). | |
| Jun 19, 2016 at 11:43 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | If you use the construction of K-theory of Cisinski and Blumberg-Mandell, which doesn't use cofibrations, you see that it's enough that your functor preserves weak equivalences. | |
| Jun 19, 2016 at 10:06 | answer | added | Dustin Clausen | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 15, 2016 at 11:28 | history | asked | Akhil Mathew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |