Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:45 comment added Matthias Klupsch @JayTaylor : You are right, this looks better. I edited it.
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:44 history edited Matthias Klupsch CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 19 characters in body
Jun 13, 2016 at 15:00 comment added Jay Taylor @MatthiasKlupsch I think from an English perspective I'd slightly modify your formulation as follows: "If $\chi \in \mathrm{Irr}(B)$ is real valued then there are at most two real-valued irreducible Brauer characters which are constituents of $\widehat{\chi} = \chi|_{G_{p'}}$." This, for me, is then quite clear.
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:42 comment added Frieder Ladisch Maybe better, but I'm not completely sure... I still find my formulation, or Feit's original formulation, less ambiguous. Of course it is a question of english language, and it's not my native language, either.
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:12 comment added Matthias Klupsch @FriederLadisch You are right, I tried to fix it. Do you think it is Ok now?
Jun 13, 2016 at 14:07 history edited Matthias Klupsch CC BY-SA 3.0
added 17 characters in body
Jun 13, 2016 at 13:22 comment added Frieder Ladisch I think your formulation is still ambiguous and can be mistaken to say that $\widehat{\chi}$ is the sum of at most two irreducible Brauer characters, and these are real valued. But the theorem says: At most two of the irreducible Brauer constituents of $\widehat{\chi}$ are real valued (but there may be others).
Jun 13, 2016 at 10:04 vote accept Matthias Klupsch
Jun 13, 2016 at 8:51 history answered Matthias Klupsch CC BY-SA 3.0