Timeline for Relations between two definitions of non-archimedean analytic spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2016 at 6:17 | vote | accept | Mingchen Xia | ||
| Jul 19, 2016 at 8:00 | answer | added | Jérôme Poineau | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 13:52 | comment | added | nfdc23 | The connection between the two is explained in 1.5 of Berkovich's big IHES paper on etale cohomology for non-archimedean analytic spaces (where he introduces the more general notion you mention at the start). What Berkovich had overlooked when he wrote the original little book is that the construction in the book is not general enough to account for all reasonable (e.g., quasi-compact and separated) rigid-analytic spaces (see 1.6 in the IHES paper). And there are much more than 2 definitions of non-archimedean analytic spaces in the literature: also Tate, Raynaud, Huber, Fujiwara-Kato,... | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 13:38 | history | edited | Mingchen Xia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 13:31 | history | asked | Mingchen Xia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |