Timeline for Base decomposition of matroids
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2016 at 22:12 | answer | added | John Machacek | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Jun 11, 2016 at 21:36 | history | suggested | John Machacek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
LaTex and relevant tag
|
| Jun 11, 2016 at 21:19 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 11, 2016 at 21:36 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2016 at 13:44 | history | edited | Quentin Fortier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 12:06 | history | edited | Quentin Fortier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 7:52 | history | edited | Quentin Fortier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 132 characters in body
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 7:31 | history | edited | Quentin Fortier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
independent instead of base
|
| Jun 9, 2016 at 7:30 | comment | added | Quentin Fortier | If the matroid graph is not complete, certainly not indeed. Let's say that I don't need B_1, ... B_k to be bases but only independent. | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 7:22 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | But a set of edges incident to a vertex is not a base. | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 6:40 | history | asked | Quentin Fortier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |