Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 10, 2016 at 18:25 history edited Mikhail Borovoi CC BY-SA 3.0
III to Ш
Jun 5, 2016 at 16:17 comment added user42024 For me it looks more natural because then you can relate it to cohomological obstructions and use the machinery of algebraic geometry/algebraic number theory afterwards. Also from algebraico-geometric point of view the "base change" of $K^\times/\mathbb Q^\times$ to $\mathbb Q_p$ is the diagonal quotient by $\mathbb Q_p^\times$, not the sum of quotients of each summand
Jun 5, 2016 at 16:08 comment added user42024 Yes, i guess it is weaker indeed. I was following the suggestion in the comment of GH from MO to choose one rational q for all places above fixed p, and also replace Q with Q_p. Sorry for not mentioning that
Jun 5, 2016 at 13:02 comment added David E Speyer The phrase "where $k$ is square" is an artifact of bad editing. Cannot write it as $q k^2$ where $q \in \mathbb{Q}_5$ and $k \in K^{\times}_{2+i} \times K^{\times}_{2-i}$.
Jun 5, 2016 at 12:30 comment added David E Speyer For example, let $K = \mathbb{Q}[i]$, and choose $a \equiv 1 \bmod 2+i$ and $\equiv 2 \bmod 2-i$. Then $a$ is of the form $q k^2$ in both $K_{2+i}$ and $K_{2-i}$, but it is not zero in $\left( (K_{2+i}^{\times}/(K_{2+i}^{\times})^2) \times (K_{2-i}^{\times}/(K_{2-i}^{\times})^2) \right)/\mathbb{Q}_5$. In other words, we can't write it as $qk^2$ where $k$ is square at both $2+i$ and $2-i$, since $1$ is a QR and $2$ is a non-QR modulo $5$. Probably the OP wanted to ask for the condition you answered about.
Jun 5, 2016 at 12:25 comment added David E Speyer I didn't follow every detail, but I am worried that your translation of the original question into cohomological language may be flawed. You write "if you want to prove that $a \in K^{\times}/((K^{\times})^2 \mathbb{Q})$ is zero if and only if it is zero in $\left( \prod_{\mathfrak{p}|p} K_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\times}/(K_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\times})^2 \right)/ \mathbb{Q}_p$. But the OP asks for it to be zero in $\prod_{\mathfrak{p}|p} K_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\times}/\left( (K_{\mathfrak{p}}^{\times})^2 \mathbb{Q}_p \right)$ and this seems like a weaker condition to me. (continued)
Jun 5, 2016 at 8:09 comment added Mikhail Borovoi Yes, it is well known that for any finite Galois module $M$ over a number field $k$, the Tate-Shafarevich kernel $ш^1(k,M)$ is finite.
Jun 4, 2016 at 21:54 comment added user42024 I deleted the wrong part from the answer But I suppose it still should be true that $Sh(T[n])$ is finite
Jun 4, 2016 at 21:53 history edited user42024 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 303 characters in body
Jun 4, 2016 at 21:50 comment added user42024 Ah, I had a simple argument in my head, with writing down long exact sequences of cohomology groups for $0\rightarrow T[n] \rightarrow T \rightarrow T\rightarrow 0$ for absolute Galois groups of $\mathbb Q$ and sum over $\mathbb Q_p$ correspondingly and looking on the natural map from one to another, but it appears to be wrong
Jun 4, 2016 at 21:19 comment added Mikhail Borovoi Could you please explain, why $Ш^1(T)=0$ implies $Ш^1(T[n])=0$?
Jun 4, 2016 at 21:10 comment added Mikhail Borovoi It is known that in general $Ш^1(T[4])\neq 0$, see Section 2 of Sansuc's paper, however it is not immediately clear how to construct a counter-example for $T[2]$.
Jun 4, 2016 at 19:55 comment added user42024 One additional comment: Shafarevich-Tate group of a torus is known to be finite, so if you replace degree 2 by some prime p in your question, this kind of argument shows that for a fixed field K the statement is true for p big enough (bigger than the order of Sh(T))
Jun 4, 2016 at 19:41 history edited user42024 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 7 characters in body
Jun 4, 2016 at 19:31 history answered user42024 CC BY-SA 3.0