Skip to main content
Post Undeleted by Piero D'Ancona
added 566 characters in body
Source Link
Piero D'Ancona
  • 9k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 57

I posted an ideaSome thoughts on your problem. If $u$ is so smooth that $Du$ has a well defined trace, e.g., $u\in H^s$ for $s>3/2$, then you could flatten the surface by a $C^1$ change of variables and reduce to the case $S=\{x_1=0\}$. Then the assumption on $Du$ becomes $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ which means the derivatives of the trace are zero a.e. on the coordinate plane $S$, and hence $u$ is constant there. This seems to rough to be interesting, sowork fine for Sobolev functions and maybe for other functional spaces.

For $BV$ functions I decidedam a bit skeptical; you have a well defined $L^1$ trace for $u$, but in what sense would you formulate your assumption on $Du$ restricted to delete it$S$?

I posted an idea which seems to rough to be interesting, so I decided to delete it

Some thoughts on your problem. If $u$ is so smooth that $Du$ has a well defined trace, e.g., $u\in H^s$ for $s>3/2$, then you could flatten the surface by a $C^1$ change of variables and reduce to the case $S=\{x_1=0\}$. Then the assumption on $Du$ becomes $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ which means the derivatives of the trace are zero a.e. on the coordinate plane $S$, and hence $u$ is constant there. This seems to work fine for Sobolev functions and maybe for other functional spaces.

For $BV$ functions I am a bit skeptical; you have a well defined $L^1$ trace for $u$, but in what sense would you formulate your assumption on $Du$ restricted to $S$?

deleted 381 characters in body
Source Link
Piero D'Ancona
  • 9k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 57

I have not time to check all the details, but maybe you can make something out of thisposted an idea. Let $u\in BV$. By a change of variables you can reduce which seems to the case the surface is $x_1=0$, and $u$ has an $L^1$ trace $u(0,x')=f(x')$. Your assumption in this case reducesrough to $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ a.e. along $x_1=0$, which means $Df=0$. If this is correctbe interesting, you're done. Necessary background material you can find e.g. in Giusti's book (Minimal Surfaces and BV functions).so I decided to delete it

I have not time to check all the details, but maybe you can make something out of this idea. Let $u\in BV$. By a change of variables you can reduce to the case the surface is $x_1=0$, and $u$ has an $L^1$ trace $u(0,x')=f(x')$. Your assumption in this case reduces to $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ a.e. along $x_1=0$, which means $Df=0$. If this is correct, you're done. Necessary background material you can find e.g. in Giusti's book (Minimal Surfaces and BV functions).

I posted an idea which seems to rough to be interesting, so I decided to delete it

deleted 45 characters in body
Source Link
Piero D'Ancona
  • 9k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 57

I have not time to check all the details, sorry!, but maybe you can make something out of this idea. Let $u\in BV$. By a change of variables you can reduce to the case the surface is $x_1=0$, and $u$ has an $L^1$ trace $u(0,x')=f(x')$. Your assumption in this case reduces to $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ a.e. along $x_1=0$ (first step to check), which means (second step to check) $Df=0$. If this is correct, you're done. Necessary background material you can find e.g. in Giusti's book (Minimal Surfaces and BV functions).

I have not time to check all the details, sorry!, but maybe you can make something out of this idea. Let $u\in BV$. By a change of variables you can reduce to the case the surface is $x_1=0$, and $u$ has an $L^1$ trace $u(0,x')=f(x')$. Your assumption in this case reduces to $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ a.e. along $x_1=0$ (first step to check), which means (second step to check) $Df=0$. If this is correct, you're done. Necessary background material you can find e.g. in Giusti's book (Minimal Surfaces and BV functions).

I have not time to check all the details, but maybe you can make something out of this idea. Let $u\in BV$. By a change of variables you can reduce to the case the surface is $x_1=0$, and $u$ has an $L^1$ trace $u(0,x')=f(x')$. Your assumption in this case reduces to $Du=(D_1u,0,...,0)$ a.e. along $x_1=0$, which means $Df=0$. If this is correct, you're done. Necessary background material you can find e.g. in Giusti's book (Minimal Surfaces and BV functions).

Post Deleted by Piero D'Ancona
Post Undeleted by Piero D'Ancona
Post Deleted by Piero D'Ancona
Source Link
Piero D'Ancona
  • 9k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 57
Loading