Timeline for Can Cantor set be the zero set of a continuous function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 9, 2018 at 17:32 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formatted equations.
|
Jul 9, 2018 at 13:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 9, 2018 at 17:32 | |||||
May 16, 2011 at 18:24 | comment | added | skeptical scientist | Each bump in the bump function has width 1/3^n. If the height is h(n), then the largest value of the kth derivative of of the stage n bumps will be 3^{kn}h(n) times the largest value of the kth derivative of the original bump function. If you want these to converge uniformly, the exact condition you need is that 3^{kn}h(n) converges to 0. So the necessary and sufficient condition on h to make the construction work is that for all a>0, h(n) is eventually less than a^n. So yes, 2^{-2^n} will work. | |
May 9, 2010 at 19:41 | vote | accept | pinaki | ||
May 9, 2010 at 19:21 | comment | added | Roland van der Veen | @Harald: Thanks you're absolutely right. I meant to say 2^{-2^n}. That should work. | |
May 9, 2010 at 19:20 | history | edited | Roland van der Veen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
corrected height of the bump
|
May 9, 2010 at 19:03 | comment | added | Harald Hanche-Olsen | If you work through the details, I suspect you may find you need the bumps at step $n$ to have heights decreasing faster than $2^{-n}$. The reason is that the bump has to fit into an interval of length $3^{-n}$, and the resulting squeeze makes the derivatives big (relatively speaking). | |
May 9, 2010 at 18:33 | history | answered | Roland van der Veen | CC BY-SA 2.5 |