Timeline for Has Dedekind's proof of existence of infinite sets been analyzed by historians?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2016 at 16:15 | vote | accept | Mikhail Katz | ||
| Jun 5, 2016 at 15:26 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
| Jun 5, 2016 at 15:16 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | Ferreiros pointed out privately that the theorem is analyzed in his book on page 244 and following. In fact this is mentioned in a parenthetical comment on page 111 which I did not notice earlier. If you add this information to your answer I will accept it. | |
| Jun 2, 2016 at 16:13 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 199 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 16:13 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | apology for this silly oversight on my part, link removed | |
| Jun 2, 2016 at 16:11 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | Carlo, the pdf by David Joyce is the one I linked in my Question. He does not analyze the proof. | |
| Jun 2, 2016 at 15:04 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 176 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 14:14 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | The relevant page is 111 where Ferreiros alludes to the proof, but he does not analyze it. | |
| S Jun 2, 2016 at 13:59 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added also Google Books link directly to page 107.
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 13:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 2, 2016 at 13:59 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2016 at 13:36 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 13:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jun 2, 2016 at 13:32 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2016 at 13:28 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |