Timeline for Errata on Rezk's paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 2:37 | vote | accept | Edoardo Lanari | ||
| May 31, 2016 at 14:47 | answer | added | Charles Rezk | timeline score: 30 | |
| May 31, 2016 at 14:35 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | Did you try to contact the author? That may be a more efficient way around it. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 6:54 | comment | added | Edoardo Lanari | As you said, the (possibly apparent) circularity still remains, as I am referring to the updated version which incorporates the new proof. Also, if you read the new proof separately, you can see it still refers to Prop 6.4. | |
| S May 31, 2016 at 4:48 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
included the title of the paper
|
| May 31, 2016 at 4:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 31, 2016 at 4:48 | |||||
| May 31, 2016 at 4:34 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | I will point out that the author has on his website Correction to “A cartesian presentation of weak n-categories”. There you can also find the version which was published - dx.doi.org/10.2140/gt.2010.14.521 - and compare it to the arxiv version if you want to. The correction was published in the same journal: dx.doi.org/10.2140/gt.2010.14.2301 (I guess this does not help with the circularity issue, but still mentioning the published versions seemed relevant enough to add a comment.) | |
| May 31, 2016 at 2:21 | history | asked | Edoardo Lanari | CC BY-SA 3.0 |