Timeline for Dual space of vector fields with null divergence
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 3, 2016 at 9:32 | history | edited | Asaf Karagila♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 3, 2016 at 8:55 | history | edited | Bazin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jun 1, 2016 at 21:14 | history | edited | Bazin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A brief point on Navier-Stokes weak solutions.
|
Jun 1, 2016 at 21:01 | comment | added | Bazin | @Jean Duchon I added more on this topic in my question, since I haven't enough room inside a comment. | |
Jun 1, 2016 at 13:42 | comment | added | Jean Duchon | Why should it be bothering that a solution is obtained modulo a gradient? Gradients with null divergence are special enough that there is none in $L^2$, right? | |
Jun 1, 2016 at 13:07 | comment | added | Igor Khavkine | The answer to the updated question 2 is also Yes. As pointed out by Jochen, Poincaré duality for currents gives $\ker \mathrm{div} = \mathrm{im } \mathrm{grad }$ for $\mathscr{D}'$. It only remains to check that the dual space of $\widetilde{\mathscr{D}} \subset \mathscr{D}$ is given by the quotient $\mathscr{D}'/(\widetilde{\mathscr{D}})^\perp$. This is true for any closed subspace of a locally convex topological vector space, as a consequence of the Hahn-Banach theorem. Note that $\widetilde{\mathscr{D}} = \ker \mathrm{div}$ is closed because $\mathrm{div}$ is continuous. | |
Jun 1, 2016 at 10:08 | history | edited | Bazin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Thanks to the answers, I propose a more realistic second question.
|
Jun 1, 2016 at 9:49 | comment | added | Bazin | Thanks for your answers. I have modified the formulation of the questions. | |
May 31, 2016 at 11:50 | history | edited | Jochen Wengenroth |
Tag fa added
|
|
May 31, 2016 at 7:07 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | The second equality in question 2 seems right by the Poincare lemma for currents. | |
May 30, 2016 at 14:22 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | I think, you have to be more precise concerning the second question. The dual of a subspace is (canonically isomorphic to) a quotient of the dual. In which sense do you want to identify $(\tilde{\mathscr D})'$ with a subspace of $\mathscr D'(\mathbb R^3,\mathbb R^3)$? | |
May 30, 2016 at 13:39 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | The compactly supported de Rham cohomology is, according, e.g., to the book of Bott and Tu, page 19, $H^2_c(\mathbb R^3) =0$. Thus, the answer to your first question is: Yes. | |
May 30, 2016 at 13:34 | comment | added | Thomas Rot | For Q1): isn't $\tilde{\mathcal {D}}/\mathrm{curl}\mathcal{D}$ the second de Rham cohomology group with compact support, suitably dualized? If so, yes this is true. | |
May 30, 2016 at 12:52 | history | asked | Bazin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |