Timeline for Is there an explicit construction of Tate-Beilinson residue?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016 at 5:28 | history | edited | Shubhodip Mondal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 30, 2016 at 13:41 | comment | added | Shubhodip Mondal | If I am not mistaken, this is just Tate's construction with $E^+ = E_1$ and $E^- = E_2$. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 13:09 | comment | added | Shubhodip Mondal | Maybe, but I don't see it. Would you please explain what is wrong? | |
| May 30, 2016 at 13:02 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Your formula for the residue seems to have some wrong subscripts. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 11:15 | history | asked | Shubhodip Mondal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |