Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 21, 2016 at 9:19 comment added N. Gast Thanks again for the pointer. It took me some time to take the time to understand your proof of Lemma C.1 of your book but now, I am convinced that it solves my question.
Jul 21, 2016 at 9:17 vote accept N. Gast
May 27, 2016 at 19:27 comment added Jaap Eldering Once you know that $\|D\Phi_t(x)\| \le C e^{-\alpha t}$, then $\|D^k\Phi_t(x)\| \le C e^{-\alpha t}$ follows from a Gronwall-like argument. See Lemma C.1 in my book: jaapeldering.nl/includes/get.php?file=NHIM-noncompact-book.pdf
May 27, 2016 at 12:16 comment added N. Gast Thanks for this answer but I found it hard to generalize it to $C^2$. To me, the main difficulty is to prove that for $x$ close to $x^*$: $\| D^k \Phi_t(x) \| \le C^{-\alpha t}$. Once this is done, you proof seems easy to generalize to $C^k$. But even for the $C^1$ case, this is not obvious for me. Should it be?
May 26, 2016 at 15:08 history edited Jaap Eldering CC BY-SA 3.0
added 836 characters in body
May 26, 2016 at 14:06 comment added Willie Wong How do you justify $\int_0^\infty D\Phi_t(x) ~\mathrm{d}t$ exists? (Just being nitpicky here, since the proof should depend on the fact that $f$ is $C^k$ at $x^*$, otherwise there are trivial counterexamples.)
May 26, 2016 at 13:58 history answered Jaap Eldering CC BY-SA 3.0