Timeline for Kazhdan's property (T) vs. residual finiteness
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 10, 2016 at 22:09 | vote | accept | M.U. | ||
| May 26, 2016 at 21:25 | comment | added | YCor | I don't claim any argument, it's just my intuition, and also my natural reaction to such a vague question. (Well my claim is possibly in contradiction with Agol's answer but I'm unable to say if the "property X" he refers to is very strong restrictive condition, e.g., whether it implies property T for $SL_3(\mathbf{Z})$ or some infinite hyperbolic groups). | |
| May 26, 2016 at 17:33 | comment | added | M.U. | @YCor. What are your arguments for that expectation? | |
| May 26, 2016 at 17:25 | history | edited | M.U. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2016 at 21:02 | answer | added | HJRW | timeline score: 9 | |
| May 25, 2016 at 13:46 | answer | added | Ian Agol | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 25, 2016 at 13:09 | comment | added | YCor | I don't expect any interesting answer other than tautologies such as: Property X = Property T, or Property X= (Property T or not residually finite), or some kind of very restrictive Property. Maybe you have some more specific question in mind (what kind of property?) | |
| May 25, 2016 at 13:06 | comment | added | YCor | One says "residual finiteness" but "residually finite". | |
| May 25, 2016 at 11:57 | history | edited | M.U. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| May 25, 2016 at 11:45 | history | asked | M.U. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |