Timeline for Abstract result on partitions of unity?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 at 22:31 | vote | accept | Jairo Bochi | ||
| May 20, 2016 at 21:35 | answer | added | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | timeline score: 14 | |
| May 20, 2016 at 20:12 | comment | added | Jairo Bochi | @YemonChoi Aha! This seems to be a good formulation indeed! (Pretty more abstract than what I expected, though... haha.) If you have time, please expand your answer. | |
| May 20, 2016 at 20:06 | history | edited | Jairo Bochi |
added tags
|
|
| May 20, 2016 at 19:40 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | In the setting of commutative Banach algebras of functions, there is the notion of a regular Banach function algebra, which is a bit like having Urysohn's lemma. Then the book of Gelfand-Raikov-Shilov, Section 35, has a lemma that basically constructs partitions of unity subordinate to a given cover, with its elements coming from the given regular Banach algebra. (I'm in the middle of a pile of marking so am leaving this as a comment for now, until I have time to flesh this out.) | |
| May 20, 2016 at 19:30 | history | asked | Jairo Bochi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |