Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 20, 2016 at 15:00 answer added Kevin Buzzard timeline score: 9
May 20, 2016 at 12:50 answer added Jeremy Rouse timeline score: 6
May 20, 2016 at 12:25 history edited YCor
edited tags
May 20, 2016 at 11:13 comment added Kevin Buzzard Nope, I've done $10^6+1$: mwrank reports that there's a point of infinite order. Now on to $10^6+2$! This is exactly what I didn't want to do. There will surely be a smallest $N$ for which someone tried and got stuck...
May 20, 2016 at 10:58 comment added Kevin Buzzard Of course, giving a talk entitled "The determination of the congruent numbers less than 10^6 and explicit 4-descents on elliptic curves" does not definitely imply that you've done what it says in the title :-) I have emailed Matsuno.
May 20, 2016 at 10:54 comment added Kevin Buzzard Many thanks for this -- this is a great start. So if we believe Matsuno then $10^6+1$ is a candidate! According to pari this has analytic rank 2. Is it provably a congruent number? magma seems to say that the algebraic rank is at least 1. Does this mean it's spotted a rational point?
May 20, 2016 at 10:35 comment added post.as.a.guest Then Matsuno gave a seminar talk up to $10^6$ in 2006 using 4-descent. Probably Tom Fisher could hold the "record", if he bothered with the problem. nakano.math.gakushuin.ac.jp/html-files/seminar/English/…
May 20, 2016 at 10:33 comment added post.as.a.guest I thought Matsuno had the largest calculations, up to 300000 in 2005. At least that's what the ANTS-X paper (which is under BSD) on the subject says. link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-14518-6_17.pdf
May 20, 2016 at 10:21 history asked Kevin Buzzard CC BY-SA 3.0