Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

Maximal closed connected subgroups of positive dimension in $\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})$ are parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugation classes of each type, and so you could try to work out the maximal ones.

General References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers herehere and herehere) this paper addresses the problem (without proof):

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Another paper that might be helpful is:

Mostow, G. D. On maximal subgroups of real Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 74 1961 503–517.

Maximal closed connected subgroups of positive dimension in $\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})$ are parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugation classes of each type, and so you could try to work out the maximal ones.

General References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem (without proof):

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Another paper that might be helpful is:

Mostow, G. D. On maximal subgroups of real Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 74 1961 503–517.

Maximal closed connected subgroups of positive dimension in $\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})$ are parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugation classes of each type, and so you could try to work out the maximal ones.

General References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem (without proof):

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Another paper that might be helpful is:

Mostow, G. D. On maximal subgroups of real Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 74 1961 503–517.

deleted 1172 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78

Maximal closed connected subgroups of positive dimension in $\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})$ are parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugation classes of each type, and so you could try to work out the maximal ones.

ReferencesGeneral References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem (without proof):

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Also, it seems that these papers might be helpful, in conjunction with Dykin's paper Maximal subgroups of the classical groups:

Karpelevič, F. I. The simple subalgebras of the real Lie algebras. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 4 (1955), 3–112.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subalgebras of the real forms of classical algebras. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 93, (1953). 613–616.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subgroups of the real forms of the group of complex unimodular matrices. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 85, (1952). 1205–1208.

In fact, that is roughly what is claimed to have been done in:

Selim, Taufik Mohamed On maximal subalgebras in classical real Lie algebras. Selected translations. Selecta Math. Soviet. 6 (1987), no. 2, 163–176.

Another paper that might be helpful is:

KingMostow, OliverG. D. On some maximal subgroups of the classicalreal Lie groups. J. Algebra 68 (1981), no. 1, 109–120.

Here is an idea how to proceed.

When $G$ is simple, every maximal closed connected subgroup of positive dimension is parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugacy classes of each type, and so, in the cases you are interested in, you could try to work out the maximal subgroups for eachAnn.

For example, maximal parabolics of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ are addressed here (also see the references therein)Math. And the aforementioned classification of simple subalgebras (by Karpelevič2) ought to give a way to classify the maximal subgroups that are normalizers of semisimple subgroups74 1961 503–517.

References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem:

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Also, it seems that these papers might be helpful, in conjunction with Dykin's paper Maximal subgroups of the classical groups:

Karpelevič, F. I. The simple subalgebras of the real Lie algebras. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 4 (1955), 3–112.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subalgebras of the real forms of classical algebras. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 93, (1953). 613–616.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subgroups of the real forms of the group of complex unimodular matrices. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 85, (1952). 1205–1208.

In fact, that is roughly what is claimed to have been done in:

Selim, Taufik Mohamed On maximal subalgebras in classical real Lie algebras. Selected translations. Selecta Math. Soviet. 6 (1987), no. 2, 163–176.

Another paper that might be helpful is:

King, Oliver On some maximal subgroups of the classical groups. J. Algebra 68 (1981), no. 1, 109–120.

Here is an idea how to proceed.

When $G$ is simple, every maximal closed connected subgroup of positive dimension is parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugacy classes of each type, and so, in the cases you are interested in, you could try to work out the maximal subgroups for each.

For example, maximal parabolics of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ are addressed here (also see the references therein). And the aforementioned classification of simple subalgebras (by Karpelevič) ought to give a way to classify the maximal subgroups that are normalizers of semisimple subgroups.

Maximal closed connected subgroups of positive dimension in $\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})$ are parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugation classes of each type, and so you could try to work out the maximal ones.

General References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem (without proof):

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Another paper that might be helpful is:

Mostow, G. D. On maximal subgroups of real Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 74 1961 503–517.

Post Undeleted by Sean Lawton
Post Deleted by Sean Lawton
deleted 194 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78

References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem:

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Also, it seems that these papers might be helpful, in conjunction with Dykin's paper Maximal subgroups of the classical groups:

Karpelevič, F. I. The simple subalgebras of the real Lie algebras. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 4 (1955), 3–112.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subalgebras of the real forms of classical algebras. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 93, (1953). 613–616.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subgroups of the real forms of the group of complex unimodular matrices. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 85, (1952). 1205–1208.

In fact, that is roughly what is claimed to have been done in:

Selim, Taufik Mohamed On maximal subalgebras in classical real Lie algebras. Selected translations. Selecta Math. Soviet. 6 (1987), no. 2, 163–176.

Another paper that might be helpful is:

King, Oliver On some maximal subgroups of the classical groups. J. Algebra 68 (1981), no. 1, 109–120.

Here is an idea how to proceed.

When $G$ is simple, every maximal closed connected subgroup of positive dimension is parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugacy classes of parabolics, maximal torieach type, and by Richardson's A rigidity theorem for subalgebras of Lie and associative algebras there are also finitely many conjugacy classes normalizers of semisimple subgroups. Inso, in the cases you are interested in, you could try to work out the maximal subgroups in these three classesfor each.

For example, maximal parabolics of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ are addressed here (also see the references therein). And the aforementioned classification of simple subalgebras (by Karpelevič) ought to give a way to classify the maximal subgroups that are normalizers of semisimple subgroups.

References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem:

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Also, it seems that these papers might be helpful, in conjunction with Dykin's paper Maximal subgroups of the classical groups:

Karpelevič, F. I. The simple subalgebras of the real Lie algebras. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 4 (1955), 3–112.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subalgebras of the real forms of classical algebras. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 93, (1953). 613–616.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subgroups of the real forms of the group of complex unimodular matrices. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 85, (1952). 1205–1208.

In fact, that is roughly what is claimed to have been done in:

Selim, Taufik Mohamed On maximal subalgebras in classical real Lie algebras. Selected translations. Selecta Math. Soviet. 6 (1987), no. 2, 163–176.

Another paper that might be helpful is:

King, Oliver On some maximal subgroups of the classical groups. J. Algebra 68 (1981), no. 1, 109–120.

Here is an idea how to proceed.

When $G$ is simple, every maximal closed connected subgroup of positive dimension is parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugacy classes of parabolics, maximal tori, and by Richardson's A rigidity theorem for subalgebras of Lie and associative algebras there are also finitely many conjugacy classes normalizers of semisimple subgroups. In the cases you are interested in you could try to work out the maximal subgroups in these three classes.

For example, maximal parabolics of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ are addressed here (also see the references therein). And the aforementioned classification of simple subalgebras (by Karpelevič) ought to give a way to classify the maximal subgroups that are normalizers of semisimple subgroups.

References

According to the MathSciNet review (see also MO answers here and here) this paper addresses the problem:

Komrakov, B. P. Maximal subalgebras of real Lie algebras and a problem of Sophus Lie. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 311 (1990), no. 3, 528--532; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 41 (1990), no. 2, 269–273 (1991)

Also, it seems that these papers might be helpful, in conjunction with Dykin's paper Maximal subgroups of the classical groups:

Karpelevič, F. I. The simple subalgebras of the real Lie algebras. Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 4 (1955), 3–112.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subalgebras of the real forms of classical algebras. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 93, (1953). 613–616.

Karpelevič, F. I. Classification of the simple subgroups of the real forms of the group of complex unimodular matrices. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 85, (1952). 1205–1208.

In fact, that is roughly what is claimed to have been done in:

Selim, Taufik Mohamed On maximal subalgebras in classical real Lie algebras. Selected translations. Selecta Math. Soviet. 6 (1987), no. 2, 163–176.

Another paper that might be helpful is:

King, Oliver On some maximal subgroups of the classical groups. J. Algebra 68 (1981), no. 1, 109–120.

Here is an idea how to proceed.

When $G$ is simple, every maximal closed connected subgroup of positive dimension is parabolic, the normalizer of a connected semisimple subgroup, or the normalizer of a maximal torus. There are finitely many conjugacy classes of each type, and so, in the cases you are interested in, you could try to work out the maximal subgroups for each.

For example, maximal parabolics of $\mathrm{GL}_n$ are addressed here (also see the references therein). And the aforementioned classification of simple subalgebras (by Karpelevič) ought to give a way to classify the maximal subgroups that are normalizers of semisimple subgroups.

deleted 28 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78
Loading
added 993 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78
Loading
added 711 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78
Loading
added 142 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78
Loading
Source Link
Sean Lawton
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 46
  • 78
Loading