Skip to main content

Timeline for Open non-parallelizable 4-manifolds

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 17, 2016 at 2:04 comment added Danny Ruberman @Ryan: Perhaps a more natural construction is to take a compact non-orientable surface (with a Riemannian metric) $\times R^2$ where the latter has the Minkowski metric. This version is (presumably--I don't know much about Lorentz metrics) complete.
May 16, 2016 at 22:42 vote accept Michael
May 16, 2016 at 22:02 comment added Igor Belegradek It seems the wikipedia article assumes the manifold is spin, in which case there is no $w_2$. It says: "Usually, one also requires that a world manifold admits a spinor structure in order to describe Dirac fermion fields in gravitation theory. There is the additional topological obstruction to the existence of this structure. In particular, a noncompact world manifold must be parallelizable."
May 16, 2016 at 22:00 comment added Ryan Budney I suppose taking a non-orientable 3-manifold and building the orientable (total space) $S^1$-bundle over it would give you a non-parallelizable lorentzian manifold. You could then puncture it once to make it open.
May 16, 2016 at 21:58 history answered Danny Ruberman CC BY-SA 3.0