Skip to main content
An extra-word was added.
Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the unramified double coveringcoverings of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the unramified double coverings of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

An extra-word was deleted.
Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which is   (by results of MR1748293, arXiv arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which is (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which   (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

A missing word was inserted.
Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which is (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which is (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

Here is an example of a hyperelliptic $M$ that admits two Prym varieties that are not isogenous (actually, there are no nonzero homomorphisms between them). Namely, let $g \ge 8$ be an integer, $f(x)$ an irreducible degree $(2g+2)$ polynomial over the rationals, whose Galois group is the full symmetric group $\mathbf{S}_{2g+2}$ of permutations on $(2g+2)$ letters. (E.g., one may take $f(x)=x^{2g+2}-x-1$, thanks to results of Selmer and Osada.) Take as $M$ the (compact) genus $g$ Riemann surface of $\sqrt{f(x)}$, i.e., the smooth projective model of the plane algebraic curve $y^2=f(x)$. Then (thanks to Mumford and Dalalyan) the double covering of $M$ are indexed by partions of the set $R_f$ of of roots of $f(x)$ into a disjoint union of nonempty even cardinalty sets $T$ and $S$ such that the corresponding Prym variety is a product $J_S\times J_T$ of the jacobians of hyperelliptic curves $C_S:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in S}(x-\alpha)$ and $C_T:y^2=\prod_{\alpha\in T}(x-\alpha)$ respectively. The dimensions of $J_S$ and $J_T$ are $(\#(S)-2)/2$ and $(\#(T)-2)/2$ respectively.

Assume that each of $S$ and $T$ has, at least, 4 elements, i.e., both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are positive-dimensional. By results of MR2961409 (arXiv:1012.3731 [math.AG])(Sect.5), the Galois property of $f(x)$ imply that both $J_S$ and $J_T$ are absolutely simple complex abelian varieties and there are no nonzero homomorphism between them. Now let us choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $(2g)$-element set $S^{\prime}$ and two-element $T^{\prime}$. Then the corresponding Prym variety is $J_{S^{\prime}}$, which is (by results of MR1748293, arXiv:math/9909052 [math.AG]) is an absolutely simple $(g-1)$-dimensional complex abelian variety. Since both $\dim(J_S)$ and $\dim(J_T)$ are strictly less than $g-1$ (actually, they are both positive and their sum is $g-1$), there are no nonzero homomorphisms between $J_S$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, between $J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$, and therefore between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S^{\prime}}$. More generally, one may choose another partition of $R_f$ into a disjoint union of $S_1$ and $T_1$ in such a way that $\#(S)\ne \#(S_1), \#(S) \ne \#(T_1)$ and then the dimension arguments imply that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between absolutely simple $J_S$ and $J_{S_1}$, $J_S$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{T_1}$, $J_T$ and $J_{S_1}$. This implies that there are no nonzero homomorphisms between Prym varieties $J_S\times J_T$ and $J_{S_1}\times J_{T_1}$.

One should add that the jacobian of the corresponding covering space is isogenous to a product of the jacobian $J(M)$ of $M$ and the corresponding Prym variety. Notice that in our case $J(M)$ is an absolutely simple $g$-dimensional complex abelian variety.

A clarification about Prym varieties.
Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31
Loading
a slight clarification
Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31
Loading
Source Link
Yuri Zarhin
  • 5.1k
  • 22
  • 31
Loading