Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
John Rognes
  • 9.3k
  • 45
  • 52

Jean-LucLouis Loday told me about the extended action by $\Sigma_{j+1}$ in the fall of 1992, after an Oberwolfach talk I gave about the rank filtration of algebraic $K$-theory, where the $\Sigma_j$-representations given by the integral homology of the Goodwillie derivative spectra $W_j$ played a role. I had shown that these representations were freely generated by $j$-fold Lie brackets, and Loday knew the connection to spaces of trees. Maybe you were there, too?

Jean-Luc Loday told me about the extended action by $\Sigma_{j+1}$ in the fall of 1992, after an Oberwolfach talk I gave about the rank filtration of algebraic $K$-theory, where the $\Sigma_j$-representations given by the integral homology of the Goodwillie derivative spectra $W_j$ played a role. I had shown that these representations were freely generated by $j$-fold Lie brackets, and Loday knew the connection to spaces of trees. Maybe you were there, too?

Jean-Louis Loday told me about the extended action by $\Sigma_{j+1}$ in the fall of 1992, after an Oberwolfach talk I gave about the rank filtration of algebraic $K$-theory, where the $\Sigma_j$-representations given by the integral homology of the Goodwillie derivative spectra $W_j$ played a role. I had shown that these representations were freely generated by $j$-fold Lie brackets, and Loday knew the connection to spaces of trees. Maybe you were there, too?

Source Link
John Rognes
  • 9.3k
  • 45
  • 52

Jean-Luc Loday told me about the extended action by $\Sigma_{j+1}$ in the fall of 1992, after an Oberwolfach talk I gave about the rank filtration of algebraic $K$-theory, where the $\Sigma_j$-representations given by the integral homology of the Goodwillie derivative spectra $W_j$ played a role. I had shown that these representations were freely generated by $j$-fold Lie brackets, and Loday knew the connection to spaces of trees. Maybe you were there, too?