Timeline for what is the associated Borel set of a Borel measurable function on the extended real line?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 14, 2017 at 6:28 | history | suggested | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced tinypic links by imgur links (which should be more stable) - the question has been bumped by an answer
|
| Apr 14, 2017 at 6:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 14, 2017 at 6:28 | |||||
| May 8, 2010 at 11:19 | vote | accept | zzzhhh | ||
| May 8, 2010 at 11:18 | answer | added | zzzhhh | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 8, 2010 at 4:43 | history | edited | zzzhhh | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| May 8, 2010 at 1:27 | history | edited | zzzhhh | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 114 characters in body
|
| May 8, 2010 at 1:24 | comment | added | zzzhhh | Gerald Edgar: I have noticed that although Halmos' book is a classic, its notions and definitions are not widely accepted, leading to difficulties of understanding in discussion on measure theory as if I'm speaking a foreign language. Could you please recommend a modern textbook whose notions and definitions are widely accepted and at the same time as clear and in-depth as Halmos' book, and that, in particular, contains Kevin's definition of the extended Borel set? Thanks! | |
| May 7, 2010 at 15:03 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | There are complications that come because Halmos does everything using sigma-ring, rather than just sigma-algebra. I think almost everyone simply uses sigma-algebra today. | |
| May 7, 2010 at 8:13 | answer | added | Kevin Ventullo | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 7, 2010 at 7:51 | history | edited | zzzhhh | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| May 7, 2010 at 7:37 | history | edited | zzzhhh | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 117 characters in body
|
| May 7, 2010 at 7:21 | history | asked | zzzhhh | CC BY-SA 2.5 |