Timeline for Functions with scalar times orthogonal Jacobian [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 6, 2016 at 20:20 | history | closed |
Steven Gubkin Willie Wong Alexandre Eremenko Stefan Waldmann Wolfgang |
Duplicate of functions with orthogonal Jacobian | |
May 6, 2016 at 20:14 | vote | accept | ualex | ||
May 6, 2016 at 1:07 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 1 | |
May 5, 2016 at 23:26 | comment | added | Christian Remling | It is true that the linked question is not exactly the same as the one you ask here. However, Alexandre Eremenko, in a prescient move across the time continuum, does answer the question you asked ("conformal" = "angle preserving" should be formalized by your condition). | |
May 5, 2016 at 22:03 | history | edited | ualex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I stressed the difference between this question and a similar, previous question.
|
May 5, 2016 at 21:30 | comment | added | ualex | I might have misunderstood that answer: I thought it only refers to functions whose Jacobian is an orthogonal matrix. My question regards Jacobians which are scaled orthogonal matrices, where the scaling may depend on the variable $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$. | |
May 5, 2016 at 21:08 | review | Close votes | |||
May 6, 2016 at 20:20 | |||||
May 5, 2016 at 20:45 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | Your question is answered in the accepted answer to the linked question. | |
May 5, 2016 at 20:42 | answer | added | Steven Gubkin | timeline score: 1 | |
May 5, 2016 at 20:32 | review | First posts | |||
May 5, 2016 at 20:36 | |||||
May 5, 2016 at 20:25 | history | asked | ualex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |