Timeline for Is it possible to have a research career while checking the proof of every theorem that you cite?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2016 at 21:08 | comment | added | Douglas Zare | Not all endorsements are the same. A stand-alone statement that you endorse a result should not be confused with building on a result. | |
| May 4, 2016 at 20:22 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 372 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2016 at 13:41 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | I like this answer very much. Personally, as a reader and referee, I would prefer people to state clearly in separate theorems the parts which they are using from the literature, and which may be hard or obscure, rather than merely saying in the middle of a proof "By [13, Theorem 2.2] ..." | |
| S May 4, 2016 at 12:17 | history | answered | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S May 4, 2016 at 12:17 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Alexandre Eremenko |