Timeline for Motivation for some operators in the dyadic model of Navier Stokes equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2016 at 6:43 | comment | added | user91210 | @dalbrit, I can't find the motivation -- I mean why the dyadic version of B is the cascade difference. All the paper around these I checked didn't talk about this, they simply write down the definition of cascade operator only. | |
| May 4, 2016 at 19:35 | comment | added | user70229 | See the introduction of Kiselev-Zlatos, "On discrete models of the Euler equations," which has a nice description. See also Katz-Pavlovic, "A cheap Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequality for Navier-Stokes equations with hyper-dissipation." Note that the model in the "cheap" Katz-Pavlovic paper is slightly different than the model in their "Finite time blow-up" paper, which I think you are looking at now. | |
| May 4, 2016 at 10:06 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | terrytao.wordpress.com/tag/dyadic-models | |
| May 4, 2016 at 10:00 | review | First posts | |||
| May 4, 2016 at 10:21 | |||||
| May 4, 2016 at 9:56 | history | asked | user91210 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |