Timeline for Moving a result from the unconditional to the conditional
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2016 at 1:16 | vote | accept | D.R. | ||
| May 8, 2016 at 18:49 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 8, 2016 at 13:14 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 5, 2016 at 4:07 | comment | added | D.R. | Interesting idea. And of course Polish does not imply locally compact, e.g., Baire space ${\mathbb N}^{\mathbb N}$. Perhaps there is a counterexample lurking in there. | |
| May 5, 2016 at 3:56 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | If $S$ is compact, then $C(S)$ is separable, so you can pick a countable dense subset and use that as $\mathcal{C}$. I think you can do something similar if $S$ is locally compact (let $\mathcal{C}$ be dense in $C_c(S)$). | |
| May 5, 2016 at 3:37 | comment | added | D.R. | Yes, that is correct. | |
| May 4, 2016 at 0:27 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Have I got it right that $\zeta_n$ are random measures on the space $\mathcal{P}(S)$ of measures? That is, they are $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(S))$-valued random variables? | |
| May 4, 2016 at 0:07 | history | asked | D.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |