Timeline for How to write $\mathbb{C}[G/U_-]=\oplus_{\lambda} V_{\lambda}$ explicitly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 3, 2016 at 14:41 | answer | added | Allen Knutson | timeline score: 7 | |
May 3, 2016 at 8:06 | vote | accept | Jianrong Li | ||
May 3, 2016 at 6:54 | answer | added | Friedrich Knop | timeline score: 12 | |
May 3, 2016 at 3:40 | comment | added | Dave Witte Morris | It is not true that $G = U_- B$ (unless $n = 1$, I guess). The set $U_- B$ is dense and open, but it is only the "big cell" of the Bruhat decomposition, and there are other (lower-dimensional) cells that are needed to get all of $G$. However, you are right that there is an embedding $\mathbb{C}[G/U_-] \hookrightarrow \mathbb{C}[B]$. (In your example, don't you also need the functions $g_{22}$, $g_{23}$, and $g_{33}$?) | |
May 3, 2016 at 3:28 | history | asked | Jianrong Li | CC BY-SA 3.0 |