Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 2, 2016 at 15:16 comment added Emil Jeřábek As for references: the only problematic condition is $T\vdash\mathrm{Pr}_T(\ulcorner\phi\urcorner)\to\mathrm{Pr}_T(\ulcorner\mathrm{Pr}_T(\ulcorner\phi\urcorner)\urcorner)$. The Claim on p. 303 of Krajíček’s Bounded Arithmetic, Propositional Logic, and Complexity Theory shows this for the theory $S^1_2$, and therefore for $PV_1$ by $\forall\Sigma^b_1$-conservativity. I couldn’t find an explicit reference for a TC^0 theory; it doesn’t seem to be stated in Cook and Nguyen’s Logical Foundations of Proof Complexity.
May 2, 2016 at 9:10 comment added Emil Jeřábek I don't understand your comment. $I\Delta_0+EXP$ is "digging into complexity" just as $\Delta^b_1$-CR is, only not deep enough to match the complexity of the problem (basic syntactic manipulations can be done in uniform $TC^0$, they don't need a tower of exponentials of running time).
May 1, 2016 at 16:10 comment added Ruizhi Yang Thanks! But if we don't dig into complexity, is $I\Delta_0 + EXP$ the best answer we can expect? Is there any reference on this question?
May 1, 2016 at 15:03 comment added Emil Jeřábek $I\Delta_0+EXP$ is an overkill. Lob's provability conditions are provable in PV, or even in TC^0 theories like Johanssen&Pollett's $\Delta^b_1$-CR.
May 1, 2016 at 14:32 comment added Payam Seraji I think $I\Delta_0$+exp is the weakest natural subsystem of PA which proves all provability conditions.
May 1, 2016 at 13:38 comment added Monroe Eskew Can you possibly "axiomatize" those conditions to create the weakest system?
May 1, 2016 at 10:08 history asked Ruizhi Yang CC BY-SA 3.0