Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 5, 2016 at 20:15 vote accept Garabed Gulbenkian
May 1, 2016 at 7:52 comment added Forever Mozart Just do some stretching. If we remove the top point of the KK fan we can stretch into a subset of $C\times [0,1]$. Then stretch it vertically into the tube. The important thing is that by connectedness of the KK fan, this tube cannot be "cut" horizontally by a clopen set.
May 1, 2016 at 7:50 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Sorry in this formulation I now don't understand what happens to the rational/irrational coordinate specifications present in the KK fan version
Apr 30, 2016 at 23:21 comment added Forever Mozart @მამუკაჯიბლაძე does my edited answer help?
Apr 30, 2016 at 23:21 history edited Forever Mozart CC BY-SA 3.0
added 461 characters in body
Apr 30, 2016 at 21:51 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე I can't. Does this imply it does not exist?
Apr 30, 2016 at 21:12 comment added Forever Mozart @WłodzimierzHolsztyński thank you! I feel accomplished now. And yes, 7 was a bit arbitrary.
Apr 30, 2016 at 21:10 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński Nice! (Kasparov's favorite number is 13, yours must be 7).
Apr 30, 2016 at 20:37 comment added Forever Mozart Can you specify a limit point that is a problem?
Apr 30, 2016 at 20:33 comment added Forever Mozart Its similar to the topologist sine curve. If you remove the interval you have a bunch of loops getting closer and closer to each other, but there is no limit point.
Apr 30, 2016 at 20:30 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე But there are infinitely many of them, and their points which were apart in KK get closer and closer to each other
Apr 30, 2016 at 20:11 comment added Forever Mozart The only convergent sequences will converge to $p$. The tube does not limit to any point of itself. Maybe it is not clear in the picture, but the loops will stop before they get to, say, the 9:00 position.
Apr 30, 2016 at 20:08 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Aren't you creating new converging sequences by weaving closer and closer to $p$? The points involved will become more and more closer to each other...
Apr 30, 2016 at 20:01 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Why removing $p$ gives $\simeq$ KK minus vertex?
Apr 30, 2016 at 19:56 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Be patient. As for me I like it very much but have not digested it yet.
Apr 30, 2016 at 19:29 history edited Forever Mozart CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 12 characters in body
Apr 30, 2016 at 19:23 history edited Forever Mozart CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 12 characters in body
Apr 30, 2016 at 19:17 history edited Forever Mozart CC BY-SA 3.0
added 8 characters in body
Apr 30, 2016 at 18:59 review First posts
Apr 30, 2016 at 19:00
Apr 30, 2016 at 18:56 history answered Forever Mozart CC BY-SA 3.0