Timeline for Bounding entries of the inverse of certain zero-one matrices
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| May 4, 2016 at 20:41 | vote | accept | Peter Dukes | ||
| May 4, 2016 at 13:27 | answer | added | Ilya Bogdanov | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 3:00 | comment | added | Peter Dukes | Please see my last paragraph. If you adjust Elkies' example to have constant column sum, it fails to have large inverse. The inverse of the circulant has all entries less than one in absolute value. Indeed, being a multiple of a stochastic matrix, we would expect small column sums in the inverse. | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 1:35 | comment | added | Christian Remling | The counterexample in the question you linked to is very close to having constant column sums, so it's clear that this condition can't help. | |
| Apr 29, 2016 at 23:16 | history | edited | Peter Dukes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Apr 29, 2016 at 22:24 | history | edited | Peter Dukes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 29, 2016 at 22:17 | history | asked | Peter Dukes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |