Timeline for Does a $W^*$ envelope exist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 10, 2016 at 8:06 | answer | added | Cameron Zwarich | timeline score: 1 | |
May 9, 2016 at 19:58 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Epsilon, I think it is hasty to say "the answer is not known" - not every operator algebraist reads MathOverflow, and those who do might not have seen your question. | |
May 3, 2016 at 2:16 | comment | added | epsilon | I guess the answer to my question is: It's not known. It's an open problem. | |
Apr 29, 2016 at 13:40 | comment | added | Uri Bader | epsilon, I erased an answer I previously posted because I realized it is was of your point. | |
Apr 28, 2016 at 22:30 | comment | added | epsilon | I'm talking about an abstract dual operator algebra $A$ (that is, there is a Hilbert space H and a w$^{*}$-continuous completely isometric isomorphism $\pi:A\to B(H)$ ). I want to know if anybody has proven that there is a minimal $W^{*}$-algebra generated by $A$ (yes, considering all representations, just like in the case of the $C^{*}$-envelope of an operator algebra). | |
S Apr 28, 2016 at 7:41 | history | suggested | Amir Sagiv | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
latex edits
|
Apr 28, 2016 at 7:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 28, 2016 at 7:41 | |||||
Apr 28, 2016 at 7:04 | comment | added | Uri Bader | Are you conidering $A$ here a sub-algebra of operators of a given Hilbert space, or do you have in mind an "abstract" Banach algebra and you wish to define a ctegorical envelope considering all possible representations? | |
Apr 28, 2016 at 6:48 | answer | added | goleta | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 27, 2016 at 23:36 | history | edited | epsilon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
|
Apr 27, 2016 at 23:29 | history | asked | epsilon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |