Timeline for Does $a_n=\prod^n_{k=1}(1-e^{k\alpha \pi i})$ converge to zero when $\alpha$ is irrational?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 21, 2020 at 4:47 | history | edited | No One |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 9, 2016 at 23:01 | vote | accept | No One | ||
May 1, 2016 at 15:32 | answer | added | Lucia | timeline score: 24 | |
Apr 19, 2016 at 22:32 | history | edited | No One |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 19, 2016 at 22:15 | history | migrated | from math.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
Mar 2, 2016 at 20:38 | comment | added | No One | @A.S. Thank you! This idea using probability theory is nice! But I still can't see a formal rigorous proof. | |
Mar 2, 2016 at 6:08 | answer | added | Sangchul Lee | timeline score: 15 | |
Mar 2, 2016 at 5:42 | comment | added | A.S. | To see that, note that $\int_0^{2\pi} \log(1-e^{ix})=0$, and the integrand has only one singularity. At the same time, empirical distribution of $b_k=k\alpha\pi\mod 2\pi$ converges to $U(0,2\pi)$. Hence, when the region around $0$ is suddenly overemphasized (a sudden very small $b_k$), $a_k$ gets very close to zero and starts to slowly return to its "average" of $1$ (which it should not "surpass" since convergence of the rectangle intergration method outside of $0$ is quadratic - weak point) which it reaches whenever density around $0$ gets de-emphasized (drops below "average"). | |
Mar 2, 2016 at 5:21 | comment | added | A.S. | There is no convergence - $\liminf a_n=0$ while $\limsup a_n\ge 1$. | |
Mar 2, 2016 at 1:27 | answer | added | Robert Israel | timeline score: 10 | |
Mar 2, 2016 at 0:44 | history | asked | No One | CC BY-SA 3.0 |