Skip to main content
partially read; the "all" can be misunderstood as saying that all elements of [n] are in there
Source Link
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 117
  • 253

Fix integers $k$ and $n$, and denote $[n]=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$. We say that $$\pi=\begin{pmatrix}i_1 & \dots & i_m\\ j_1 & \dots & j_m\end{pmatrix}$$ is a partial two-line array if the integers $i_1,\dots,i_m$ are all distinct elements of $[n]$, the same is true for $j_1,\dots,j_m$, and $i_1<\dots<i_m$.

One more definition: a partial SYT with entry set $S$ is just a Young tableau (i.e. the entries increase along rows and columns) with distinct entries belonging tosuch that the set of its entries is $S$. For example, an SYT with $n$ boxes is a partial SYT with entry set $[n]$.

  • $\pi=\begin{pmatrix}i_1 & \dots & i_s\\ j_1 & \dots & j_s\end{pmatrix},\quad \tau=\begin{pmatrix}i'_1 & \dots & i'_t\\ j'_1 & \dots & j'_t\end{pmatrix}$ are partial two-line arrays;

  • $T,U$ are partial SYT's of the same shape $\mu/\lambda$ with entry sets $[n]\setminus \{j_1,\dots,j_s\}$ and $[n]\setminus \{i_1,\dots,i_s\}$;

  • $P,Q$ are partial SYT's of the same shape $\nu/\mu$ with entry sets $[n]\setminus \{j'_1,\dots,j'_s\}$$[n]\setminus \{j'_1,\dots,j'_t\}$ and $[n]\setminus \{i'_1,\dots,i'_s\}$$[n]\setminus \{i'_1,\dots,i'_t\}$.

Let $R$ be a partial SYT with entry set $S$, and let $q$ be an integer not belonging to $S$. Then define anthe external insertion of $q$ into $R$ to be the new partial SYT denoted $R\leftarrow q$ and defined by the following algorithm: we first row-insert $q$ into the first row of $R$, then it bumps out some element $q_1$ which we then insert into the second row of $R$, and so on until either $q_i$ is just appended on the right to the row $i+1$ of $R$ (i.e. nothing is bumped) or we reach $k$-th row of $R$ in which case we get one extra entry $q_k$ of $R$ which we memorize.

Similarly, let $(i,j)$ be an inner (that is, left) corner of $R$. Define anthe internal insertion of $(i,j)$ into $R$ to be the new partial SYT denoted $(i,j)\to R$: remove the entry $q$ from $(i,j)$ and insert it into the next row $i+1$ of $R$. It bumps out some entry $q_{i+1}$ which we then insert into row $i+2$ of $R$ and so on until either nothing is bumped or we reach row $k$ in which case we memorize the extra entry $q_k$ that we get.

  • initially, set $P=T$, $Q=\mu/\mu$ an empty tableau and $\tau:=\begin{pmatrix} \\ \end{pmatrix}$ an empty partial two-line array;
  • for each $q=1,2,\dots,n$, do the following:
  • if $q$ belongs to the entry set of $U$, then $q$ islies in an inner corner $(i,j)$ of $U$, so remove it from $Q$ and replace $P$ by $(i,j)\to P$;
  • otherwise, if $q$ is equal to $i_m$ for some $m$, replace $P$ by $P\leftarrow j_m$;
  • if we memorize an extra entry $p$ of $P$ as a result of our insertion, append $\begin{pmatrix}q\\ p \end{pmatrix}$ to $\tau$;
  • otherwise, append $q$ to $Q$ in the box that was added to $P$ at the final step of the insertion.

Fix integers $k$ and $n$, and denote $[n]=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$. We say that $$\pi=\begin{pmatrix}i_1 & \dots & i_m\\ j_1 & \dots & j_m\end{pmatrix}$$ is a partial two-line array if the integers $i_1,\dots,i_m$ are all distinct elements of $[n]$, the same is true for $j_1,\dots,j_m$, and $i_1<\dots<i_m$.

One more definition: a partial SYT with entry set $S$ is just a Young tableau (i.e. the entries increase along rows and columns) with distinct entries belonging to the set $S$. For example, an SYT with $n$ boxes is a partial SYT with entry set $[n]$.

  • $\pi=\begin{pmatrix}i_1 & \dots & i_s\\ j_1 & \dots & j_s\end{pmatrix},\quad \tau=\begin{pmatrix}i'_1 & \dots & i'_t\\ j'_1 & \dots & j'_t\end{pmatrix}$ are partial two-line arrays;

  • $T,U$ are partial SYT's of the same shape $\mu/\lambda$ with entry sets $[n]\setminus \{j_1,\dots,j_s\}$ and $[n]\setminus \{i_1,\dots,i_s\}$;

  • $P,Q$ are partial SYT's of the same shape $\nu/\mu$ with entry sets $[n]\setminus \{j'_1,\dots,j'_s\}$ and $[n]\setminus \{i'_1,\dots,i'_s\}$.

Let $R$ be a partial SYT with entry set $S$, and let $q$ be an integer not belonging to $S$. Then define an external insertion of $q$ into $R$ to be the new partial SYT denoted $R\leftarrow q$ and defined by the following algorithm: we first row-insert $q$ into the first row of $R$, then it bumps out some element $q_1$ which we then insert into the second row of $R$, and so on until either $q_i$ is just appended on the right to the row $i+1$ of $R$ (i.e. nothing is bumped) or we reach $k$-th row of $R$ in which case we get one extra entry $q_k$ of $R$ which we memorize.

Similarly, let $(i,j)$ be an inner (that is, left) corner of $R$. Define an internal insertion of $(i,j)$ into $R$ to be the new partial SYT denoted $(i,j)\to R$: remove the entry $q$ from $(i,j)$ and insert it into the next row $i+1$ of $R$. It bumps out some entry $q_{i+1}$ which we then insert into row $i+2$ of $R$ and so on until either nothing is bumped or we reach row $k$ in which case we memorize the extra entry $q_k$ that we get.

  • initially, set $P=T$, $Q=\mu/\mu$ an empty tableau and $\tau:=\begin{pmatrix} \\ \end{pmatrix}$ an empty partial two-line array;
  • for each $q=1,2,\dots,n$, do the following:
  • if $q$ belongs to the entry set of $U$, then $q$ is an inner corner $(i,j)$ of $U$, so remove it from $Q$ and replace $P$ by $(i,j)\to P$;
  • otherwise, if $q$ is equal to $i_m$ for some $m$, replace $P$ by $P\leftarrow j_m$;
  • if we memorize an extra entry $p$ of $P$ as a result of our insertion, append $\begin{pmatrix}q\\ p \end{pmatrix}$ to $\tau$;
  • otherwise, append $q$ to $Q$ in the box that was added to $P$ at the final step of the insertion.

Fix integers $k$ and $n$, and denote $[n]=\{1,2,\dots,n\}$. We say that $$\pi=\begin{pmatrix}i_1 & \dots & i_m\\ j_1 & \dots & j_m\end{pmatrix}$$ is a partial two-line array if the integers $i_1,\dots,i_m$ are distinct elements of $[n]$, the same is true for $j_1,\dots,j_m$, and $i_1<\dots<i_m$.

One more definition: a partial SYT with entry set $S$ is just a Young tableau (i.e. the entries increase along rows and columns) with distinct entries such that the set of its entries is $S$. For example, an SYT with $n$ boxes is a partial SYT with entry set $[n]$.

  • $\pi=\begin{pmatrix}i_1 & \dots & i_s\\ j_1 & \dots & j_s\end{pmatrix},\quad \tau=\begin{pmatrix}i'_1 & \dots & i'_t\\ j'_1 & \dots & j'_t\end{pmatrix}$ are partial two-line arrays;

  • $T,U$ are partial SYT's of the same shape $\mu/\lambda$ with entry sets $[n]\setminus \{j_1,\dots,j_s\}$ and $[n]\setminus \{i_1,\dots,i_s\}$;

  • $P,Q$ are partial SYT's of the same shape $\nu/\mu$ with entry sets $[n]\setminus \{j'_1,\dots,j'_t\}$ and $[n]\setminus \{i'_1,\dots,i'_t\}$.

Let $R$ be a partial SYT with entry set $S$, and let $q$ be an integer not belonging to $S$. Then define the external insertion of $q$ into $R$ to be the new partial SYT denoted $R\leftarrow q$ and defined by the following algorithm: we first row-insert $q$ into the first row of $R$, then it bumps out some element $q_1$ which we then insert into the second row of $R$, and so on until either $q_i$ is just appended on the right to the row $i+1$ of $R$ (i.e. nothing is bumped) or we reach $k$-th row of $R$ in which case we get one extra entry $q_k$ of $R$ which we memorize.

Similarly, let $(i,j)$ be an inner (that is, left) corner of $R$. Define the internal insertion of $(i,j)$ into $R$ to be the new partial SYT denoted $(i,j)\to R$: remove the entry $q$ from $(i,j)$ and insert it into the next row $i+1$ of $R$. It bumps out some entry $q_{i+1}$ which we then insert into row $i+2$ of $R$ and so on until either nothing is bumped or we reach row $k$ in which case we memorize the extra entry $q_k$ that we get.

  • initially, set $P=T$, $Q=\mu/\mu$ an empty tableau and $\tau:=\begin{pmatrix} \\ \end{pmatrix}$ an empty partial two-line array;
  • for each $q=1,2,\dots,n$, do the following:
  • if $q$ belongs to the entry set of $U$, then $q$ lies in an inner corner $(i,j)$ of $U$, so remove it from $Q$ and replace $P$ by $(i,j)\to P$;
  • otherwise, if $q$ is equal to $i_m$ for some $m$, replace $P$ by $P\leftarrow j_m$;
  • if we memorize an extra entry $p$ of $P$ as a result of our insertion, append $\begin{pmatrix}q\\ p \end{pmatrix}$ to $\tau$;
  • otherwise, append $q$ to $Q$ in the box that was added to $P$ at the final step of the insertion.
defined Young tableaux
Source Link

One more definition: a partial SYT with entry set $S$ is just a Young tableau (i.e. the entries increase along rows and columns) with distinct entries belonging to the set $S$. For example, an SYT with $n$ boxes is a partial SYT with entry set $[n]$.

One more definition: a partial SYT with entry set $S$ is just a Young tableau with distinct entries belonging to the set $S$. For example, an SYT with $n$ boxes is a partial SYT with entry set $[n]$.

One more definition: a partial SYT with entry set $S$ is just a Young tableau (i.e. the entries increase along rows and columns) with distinct entries belonging to the set $S$. For example, an SYT with $n$ boxes is a partial SYT with entry set $[n]$.

added 5 characters in body
Source Link

One can consider the semistandard version (the Knuth version) of this RSK algorithm which shows the following identity: $$\sum_{\lambda\subset \mu} s_{\mu/\lambda}=\sum_{\mu\subset \nu} s_{\nu/\mu},$$ where the sums are infinite and taken over all partitions $\lambda,\nu$ with at most $k$ parts (that are respectively to the left and right of $\mu$ in this infinite horizontal strip of height $k$). Of course, this is a stronger conjecturestatement since the number of SYT's is recovered by taking the coefficient of $x_1\dots x_n$ on both parts. ThisThe stronger conjecture is due toidentity was conjectured by Alex Postnikov.

One can consider the semistandard version (the Knuth version) of this RSK algorithm which shows the following identity: $$\sum_{\lambda\subset \mu} s_{\mu/\lambda}=\sum_{\mu\subset \nu} s_{\nu/\mu},$$ where the sums are infinite and taken over all partitions $\lambda,\nu$ with at most $k$ parts (that are respectively to the left and right of $\mu$ in this infinite horizontal strip of height $k$). Of course, this is a stronger conjecture since the number of SYT's is recovered by taking the coefficient of $x_1\dots x_n$ on both parts. This stronger conjecture is due to Alex Postnikov.

One can consider the semistandard version (the Knuth version) of this RSK algorithm which shows the following identity: $$\sum_{\lambda\subset \mu} s_{\mu/\lambda}=\sum_{\mu\subset \nu} s_{\nu/\mu},$$ where the sums are infinite and taken over all partitions $\lambda,\nu$ with at most $k$ parts (that are respectively to the left and right of $\mu$ in this infinite horizontal strip of height $k$). Of course, this is a stronger statement since the number of SYT's is recovered by taking the coefficient of $x_1\dots x_n$ on both parts. The stronger identity was conjectured by Alex Postnikov.

Source Link
Loading