Timeline for Foundations of topology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2022 at 23:27 | answer | added | Timothy Chow | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 3, 2019 at 8:15 | vote | accept | Bananeen | ||
| S Jun 29, 2017 at 5:06 | history | suggested | Matthieu FG |
Added topos tag
|
|
| Jun 29, 2017 at 3:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 29, 2017 at 5:06 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 18, 2016 at 13:16 | answer | added | Mikhail Katz | timeline score: 14 | |
| Apr 18, 2016 at 10:41 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | I don't know enough about Grothendieck's program to be able to tell whether the more accurate description of it is to develop foundations of topology "without CW complexes" or rather "without points", as in the current version of the question. Could some experts comment? @ToddTrimble? | |
| Apr 18, 2016 at 10:31 | history | reopened |
Daniel Moskovich Stefan Kohl♦ Mikhail Katz Francois Ziegler Sebastian Goette |
||
| Apr 18, 2016 at 10:31 | comment | added | Sebastian Goette | To make my point more precise - some branches of modern topology are described using model categories, $\infty$-categories and the like. I am surely not the right person to write such an answer, but maybe somebody else wants to. I am voting to reopen, and I leave it to somebody else to roll back to the original question and give an answer if he/she likes. | |
| Apr 18, 2016 at 10:26 | comment | added | Sebastian Goette | @DanielMoskovich I don't know what the OP really intended. But as he was talking about CW complexes instead of arbitrary topological spaces, it seems that your edit shifted the question considerably from the realm of algebraic-topology-oriented topology to (completely) general topology. To me this looks like a different question that you might want to ask separately. | |
| Apr 18, 2016 at 10:04 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | The theory of o-minimal structures can be interpeted as progress in this general direction; see related question here. | |
| Apr 18, 2016 at 9:10 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 18, 2016 at 10:31 | |||||
| Apr 18, 2016 at 9:01 | history | edited | Daniel Moskovich | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed extraneous paragraphs at the end. Refocussed question.; edited tags
|
| Apr 18, 2016 at 8:58 | comment | added | Daniel Moskovich | I don't know- it seems a decent enough question to me (although it could certainly use some rewriting; I've given it a try). The question is: "What approaches are there to the foundations of topology that are not based on the concept of "points"?". Voting to reopen. | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 5:41 | history | closed |
Ryan Budney user1073 Franz Lemmermeyer Alex Degtyarev HJRW |
Opinion-based | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 2:36 | history | edited | Bananeen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2016 at 2:34 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 13, 2016 at 5:43 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2016 at 2:03 | history | asked | Bananeen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |