Timeline for Are there non-smoothable homotopy/homology spheres?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 18, 2021 at 22:59 | comment | added | horned-sphere | I think your first sentence might go at the heart of Albanese's question. More precisely, it seems that back in 1960-62 when Smale, Zeeman, and Stallings proved the Topological Poincaré Conjecture for $n\geq 5$ their proofs all assumed a homotopy sphere to be smoothable, or at least PL (in contrast with Albanese's definition). Hence if one goes off of those papers we don't know that any homotopy $n$-sphere is homeomorphic to $S^n$. That is to say, it wasn't until M.H.A.Newman in "The Engulfing Theorem for Topological Manifolds" ('66) that there was a proof of the full Poincaré for $n\geq 5$. | |
Apr 14, 2016 at 19:12 | vote | accept | Michael Albanese | ||
Apr 13, 2016 at 20:54 | comment | added | Igor Belegradek | I do not know such examples, but then if you remember Freedman's work in the simply-connected case the non-smoothable examples arise in a roundabout way. It might be that the same will be true for 4-manifolds with large fundamental group, i.e. a smoothable manifold may have a non-smoothable "evil twin" which has the same intersection form and nontrivial Kirby–Siebenmann invariant. | |
Apr 13, 2016 at 20:23 | history | edited | Michael Albanese | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Apr 13, 2016 at 16:45 | comment | added | Michael Albanese | Are there any explicit examples of homology $4$-spheres for which it is not yet known if they admit a smooth structure or not? | |
Apr 13, 2016 at 1:22 | history | answered | Igor Belegradek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |